Skip to content

Primary engagement

Platform Decision Review

Review one business-critical platform or workflow, identify the constraints that matter, compare viable options, and define the first justified intervention.

Fixed-fee engagement · US$7,500–12,000

When to use the review

Growth, incidents, and cost pressure usually share one constraint.

Best suited to AWS-heavy SaaS, fintech, and data-intensive platforms where reliability, scale, cost, or platform effectiveness has become a leadership decision.

A consequential platform decision is stuck or overdue.
Reliability, scale, or cloud cost has become a leadership concern.
The team needs evidence before committing to a migration or larger program.

What you receive

From evidence to decision.

A disciplined sequence from problem framing through a leadership decision workshop.

Decision and business-stakes framing
Selected architecture and operating evidence review
Constraint and root-cause analysis
Viable options with trade-offs
Recommended decision and immediate next actions, delivered through an Executive Decision Brief and leadership workshop

How it works

Four steps from kickoff to decision.

Fixed scope, fixed fee, no arbitrary deadline.

1
Frame the decision — Define the decision boundary, business stakes, and evidence plan.
2
Review the evidence — Inspect selected architecture, telemetry, cost, delivery, incident, and repository evidence.
3
Evaluate the options — Identify constraints and compare viable paths with explicit trade-offs.
4
Decide the path — Deliver the Executive Decision Brief and facilitate the leadership decision workshop.

Proof

Experience behind the practice.

Public-safe, defensible proof from prior operating experience.

Led a 17-person platform organization
Supported 21–24 squads and approximately 140 engineers
Helped scale ingestion/processing capacity from approximately 1M documents/day to architecture capable of handling up to 10M documents/day.
Connected architecture, reliability, delivery, security, and technology cost

FAQ

Common questions.

Answers to questions buyers and procurement teams frequently raise.

Is the Platform Decision Review a fit for us?
The review is appropriate when a platform problem has become a business decision and leadership needs evidence before committing to a larger program. If the decision boundary, evidence, and options are already clear, a direct intervention or advisory conversation may be more appropriate.
What evidence and access do you need?
Read-only access by default. Named accounts, least privilege, and explicit evidence requirements are defined at the start. No production changes without explicit authorization.
What will we receive?
The primary deliverable is the Executive Decision Brief, which documents findings, options, and the recommended path. The review also includes problem and decision framing, stakeholder interviews, architecture and operating-model review, constraint and root-cause analysis, and the leadership decision workshop.
What does it cost?
US$7,500–12,000 — fixed fee for the bounded review scope. No hidden costs, no upsell pressure during the engagement.
What happens after the Review?
Recommendations are not manipulated to manufacture implementation revenue. Leadership chooses the next path based on evidence: execute internally, engage for a focused intervention, continue with advisory, engage another specialist, or defer.

Which platform decision is currently blocked?

Share the decision, why it matters now, and what evidence exists. Lirado Tech will determine whether a bounded review is appropriate.

Bring a platform decision
enpt-br